Skip to main content

Art as Representation

In different times and in different places and in different context Art critiques, thinkers have made efforts to understand the underlying essence of a piece of Art. 

Most were limited to their own times and philosophy of the world and human persons.


Fortkochi, Kerala


They were at finding ‘necessary conditions’ and ‘sufficient conditions’
for the truth of the statement that an item is an ‘art work’
.

We go back to the first of such an attempt.


It was the Greeks who first said, Art is Imitation of nature. 

And they broadened it saying, Art is Representation.


Study the PDF below. 

(to be used for educational purposes only)

Art as Representation PDF


Most art we do and we encounter on a day today basis are all imitation of nature. Those who are able to do it best are the best artists.

What makes them to be candidates for Art is the attribute of Verisimilitude they posses. More similar they are better they are appreciated. 

Nothing is an artwork, unless it is an imitation.

For Plato and Aristotle, to be an artwork requires that the piece in question be an imitation of something. That is, being an imitation—of a person, place, object, action or event.

So plato emphasised that Art is Imitation, Mirroring nature, copying nature.

Plato went a step ahead and claimed that as is also 

1. useless

2. deceptive

3. potentially dangerous


1. Art is useless because art unlike philosophy does not produce any new knowledge. Art is the reflection of the reflection of reality (world of ideas).


2. Art is deceptive because, Artists were unconcerned with facts/truth (as against philosophers).  It made no difference to artists nor to the success of their works whether the images or stories they depict were real or their messages true or good.


3. Art is dangerous because, art feeds the senses/appetite and that begins to control the mind and spirit. Instead for plato the mind and spirit must control the appetitive.


Aristotle enters the discourse.

Aristotle agreed that art was essentially Mimesis.

But, he maintained, (good) art was neither useless and deceptive  nor dangerous, but rather natural and beneficial.

Aristotle Rejected that Mimesis is mere Mirroring of Nature

Art is the outcome of a mental process

1. Rendering (perception of a thing by senses)
2. Construing (the artist interprets what he/she sees)
3. Draw / Illustrate / imaging (translates what is seen to lines and colours and words etc.)
4. Idealising (he makes it look complete, interesting and new)
5. Representing (then its represented to the viewers)

Unlike mirroring, these are acts of intellect.

Therefore good art puts forward ideal truths. (what something aught to be)


Aristotle also claimed that art is not dangerous but cathartic and therapeutic 


Aristotle offers a broader theory of Art:

Art as Representation


Aristotle reconstructed Imitation theory to Representation theory

Representation happens by

1. Resemblance

2. Illusion


But Problem still surfaced. Even with this additional breadth, the representational theory of art remains not sufficient, since much of what is called art is not representational.

How do we add these too to the ambit of art?


This problem gave rise to an advanced representation theory, called 

The neo-representational theory of art. According to the neo-representational theory of art, 

anything that is a work of art necessarily possesses the property of ‘aboutness


It must have semantic (meaning) content.

It has a subject about which it expresses something.

We can take the case of Duchamp's ready-mades. 

Duchamps ready-mades (urinal, snow shovel etc.) demand interpretations. It makes sense to ask what they are about.

On the other hand, it does not make sense to ask what ordinary urinals and snow shovels are about. Ordinary urinals and snow shovels are not about anything;

They have no semantic (meaning) content; they are mute—meaningless. They also do not imitate or represent anything else.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Visual Analysis: INTRODUCTION

 Visual analysis is a systematic and scientific examination of visual materials that explores their communicative meaning, aesthetic qualities, and functional impact. As Susan Sontag noted, humans tend to linger in "mere images of the truth," making it crucial to develop a deeper understanding of visual interpretation. Study the PDF below (for academic use only) Introduction to Visual Analysis PDF The Nature of Seeing: The process of seeing is not as spontaneous or natural as commonly believed. According to John Berger, our way of seeing art has historically been influenced by privileged minorities to maintain social and economic dominance. Visual perception requires conscious effort and is heavily influenced by habits and conventions. The visual faculty consumes approximately two-third of a person’s used energy, highlighting its significance in human experience. The Framework of Visual Analysis: Visual analysis could be traced back to communication models, for example, Har...

Visual Analysis: SEMIOTICS

 Visual analysis is a systematic and scientific approach to examining visual materials that goes far beyond casual observation.  In our visually saturated world, images have become a inescapable universal language that shapes our perceptions, attitudes, and experiences. From the artworks adorning gallery walls to the advertisements lining city streets, visuals communicate narratives, evoke emotions, and reflect sociocultural ideologies. However, the process of seeing and interpreting visuals is not as spontaneous or natural as we often assume. As John Berger notably stated, "seeing is an active decision," suggesting that the process of interpreting visuals is neither spontaneous nor natural, but rather requires conscious effort and critical thinking. The way we perceive and interpret visual content is heavily influenced by habits, conventions, and our individual perspectives.  Serious visual analyses requires conscious effort and critical analysis to unravel the laye...

Visual Analysis: LANGUAGE, ELEMENTS, AND GRAMMAR

 Visual communication plays a powerful role in shaping our understanding of the world. Like written and spoken language, visuals employ a complex grammar and system of meaning. Study the PDF below (for academic use only) Visual language, elements, and grammar PDF At its core, visual grammar is comprised of fundamental elements like line, shape, colour, texture, space, and typography. These are the basic building blocks that visual creators assemble and organise using principles like emphasis, contrast, composition, size, proportion, balance, and lighting. Just as words are assembled following the syntactical rules of language, visuals are constructed by purposefully arranging and relating these elemental units. Lines, for instance, can convey a range of associations through their orientation and qualities. Horizontal lines suggest stability and calm, verticals impart a sense of strength and authority, while diagonals imbue dynamism and movement. The weight and curvature of lines fu...

Visual Analysis: WHAT ARE VISUALS?

  Visuals are images/collection of images that are  made to be  seen. There is a continuum of images in which people live; and visual is a paused/frozen moment from them. Study the PDF below (for academic use only) What Are Visuals? PDF People/artists/designers capture/construct/make images/visuals for others to see. Therefore we only see the image/visual/frame that is given to us to see. For John Berger, a visual is a sight which has been recreated or reproduced ... which has been detached from the place and time in which it first made its appearance. Art: Traditional art, the oldest form of visual expression, represents humanity's first attempts to interpret and document the world. From prehistoric cave paintings to Renaissance masterpieces and contemporary installations, art has evolved beyond mere representation to become a vehicle for emotional, philosophical, and social commentary. Artists manipulate colour, form, texture, and space to create works that challen...

The Brown Sisters: A Four-Decade Portrait of Time and Sisterhood

 Nicholas Nixon's "The Brown Sisters" stands as one of photography's most compelling longitudinal portrait studies, documenting four decades of sisterhood through annual black-and-white photographs taken from 1975 to 2014. Using an 8×10 inch view camera, Nixon captured his wife Bebe and her three sisters—Heather, Mimi, and Laurie Brown—in the same order each year, creating a remarkable visual meditation on time, aging, and familial bonds. For the full set of images see the PDF below (for academic use only) Forty Portraits in Forty Years PDF What began as a spontaneous family photograph in 1975 evolved into a profound artistic documentation of human transformation. The project's strength lies in its methodological consistency: the sisters maintain their positions, with the sequence remaining unchanged throughout the series. This rigid framework paradoxically highlights the subtle changes that occur year by year, creating a powerful commentary on the passage of time...

A Critical Visual Analysis of Jan Banning's ‘Bureaucratics’

 Jan Banning's photographic series Bureaucratics offers a remarkable anthropological study of civil servants across eight countries, revealing how power, hierarchy, and cultural identity manifest in governmental spaces. Through meticulously composed photographs taken from a citizen's perspective, Banning unveils the theatre of bureaucracy the most immediate visual impact comes from Banning's consistent methodology: each photograph is taken from the same height and distance, positioning the viewer in the role of a citizen approaching the bureaucrat's desk. The bureaucrats are photographed in their natural habitat – their offices – which become stages where power dynamics and cultural values are performed daily. Make visual analysis of  Bureaucratics  by Jan Banning given below. Bureaucratics by Jan Banning PDF  (for academic use only) In examining the spatial arrangements, a clear pattern emerges: the desk serves as both barrier and symbol of authority. In many image...

2025 Must Create Its Own Art

 Tonight’s art becomes inadequate
and useless when the sun rises in
the morning. The mistake lies not in creating art for tonight, but in assuming tonight’s answers will serve tomorrow’s questions. Louise Bourgeois, a French American artist, reflected, “art is a guaranty of sanity;” but that guarantee must be renewed with each dawn, each cultural shift, and
each evolution of human consciousness. If some art endures through generations, it
is only because of its capacity to speak, its ability to demand fresh interpretations that test and challenge the new. To guarantee sanity in the coming year, 2025 must create
its own art. Why create art? Why watch art? Why read literature? True art, in the words of Sunil P Ilayidam, shakes that which is rigid and unchangeable. Art serves as humanity’s persistent earthquake, destabilising comfortable certainties and creating space
for new ways of seeing, thinking, and being
in the world. An artist’s duty is to reflect the times, and we see this in...