Skip to main content

The Paradoxical Mahatma

 Gandhi is a man of paradoxes. It is easy to find mistakes and inaccuracies with Gandhi. His inconsistencies are part of his evolving and shifting self-concept, says a well-known Gandhian, Sunil P Ilayidom. He elucidates it with anecdotes and examples from the life of the Mahatma. Gandhi was against writing letters, for him it took away the human warmth of meeting someone personally; but Gandhi was someone who wrote thousands of letters in his life, numbers say that he wrote about 1,08,000 letters in his lifetime. Gandhi was against Railways, according to him trains would take away the serenity of Indian countryside and villages; but Gandhiji was a regular train traveler. He did not appreciate women participating in public life; but it was in his time women felt most comfortable to make their presence felt in public life and affairs. Gandhi kept shifting, changing, and evolving. Gandhi himself has said that if I have given different opinions about one thing in different times, take what I said last as my opinion; which is also an indication that it could still change.

mahatma, gandhi,

His inconsistencies were part of his search for truth. Being honest to truth is
to have the courage to time-to-time look
at realities face to face, and call out aloud what you see, what you hear, and what you decipher. In life, sociological and religious compulsion to repeat forever only what you have seen and said already is against education and modernity. Gandhi, though determined, wasn’t stubborn. Many in the left and subaltern intellectual spectrum have less appreciation for Gandhi; they claim that Gandhi did not do enough to annihilate caste and untouchability and the like. Of course, there were serious difference of opinion between Dr BR Ambedkar and Gandhiji. When Gandhi was organising and consolidating the population of the entire India against the mighty British, Ambedkar felt that the casteless ones were not even counted or belonging to the country that Gandhi is struggling to free. It is not only Gandhi, every Indian and India as a whole live in these kinds of paradoxes, for we are so very plural.

The Conquest of Fear

‘Cowards can never be moral; fearlessness
is the first requisite of spirituality’, stated Gandhi, of course, inspired by the scriptures. In this country of self-suppression and timidity, almost bordering on cowardice, how did Gandhi become so fearless, that even his own people could not defeat him? His earlier life demonstrated a very nervous and shy Mohandas Gandhi. Gandhi was so weak physically and in terms of willpower. In his writings he says, he was afraid when he saw a football; he was convinced that if he ran into kick it he would fall. The first court case he fought at Mumbai was an easy one; he only had to read out a rule and seek the judge to give justice. He took the book in his hand and he could not complete the reading. His assistant read the passage and the case was over.

The frightened and the mediocre, if opposed quits, runs away, hides, gets de- pressed, lashes out in anger, takes revenge, etc. How did Gandhi acquire the courage and will power that he possessed; his adherence to truth and non-violence may be the key. Gandhi told us that fearless resistance is possible when we are confident that we fight injustice, and do so without using violence, and with truth. The stamp of violence on our body is ineffaceable. Gandhi warned us that the power of violence over human beings must not be underrated. It is not a weapon that we can pick up and discard at will. When violence holds individuals and groups in thrall, moral disintegration follows. We can hardly conquer fear when our bodies and
our souls have been tarnished by the violent unprincipled politics.

Truth and non-violence helps one to
have a mind of one’s own; and it is a rare asset today. Those who speak up their mind, especially when he/she is alone or part of a minority, is even rarer. Gandhi has shown the way, and he has influenced leaders across the globe in the past and in the present. Vivek Ramaswamy, in his political campaigning told a young soul, if you are the only person in a room, be it a class room, a meeting room, or a recreation room; and you happen to be the only person who believes what you do or what you think, you have an obligation, now more than ever, to stand up and speak up, or it will be missed forever. And often enough, when you do that, the reality is that, you are not the only per- son in that room who believed what you believed, who wanted to do the way you are doing it. Your courage and clarity makes others come out of their closet too. If fear is infectious, courage is contagious.

Means Is Everything

Gandhi, arguably, wore the most embarrassing outfit
as a public leader of the modern India. As an educated and as a young barrister in South Africa he was very well dressed. He even had different attire for office, evening visits, and for home. When he returned to India and began his political involvement, he decided to give up that elaborate dressing and began to dress and go about very modestly; wearing only a dhoti and a shawl. He had categorically stated, “As the means, so the end”.

Nobody knows the end. In Gandhi’s view, the
only thing that is certain and under our control is the means. What we can correct, improve and put in place is the means that we employ to arrive. Gandhi did not agree with those who said, ‘means is after all means’; for Gandhi, ‘means was everything’. Whatever end we may envisage and desire, the maximum in our power to do is the means; let that be just, fair, and non-exploitative. Did his dhoti and shawl solve any pressing problems of poverty and environment? No one knows. But his means to it was just, fair, and non-exploitative. It is easy to be carried away by the end, and by many fast and furious means to that end. I have two enemies said Mahatma, one is the British Empire, and the other is a man called, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. He eventually won over the British Empire, the other he died fighting.

“The light has gone out of our lives, and there is darkness everywhere,” stated an overwrought Nehru on radio when he announced to his country the death of a man into whose feeble body an assassin, crazed by the excesses of his ideology, had pumped three bullets. The country mourned and the world wept. And Albert Einstein said movingly, “Generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this ever in flesh and blood walked the earth."

Written as TOGETHER editorial.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Visual Analysis: INTRODUCTION

 Visual analysis is a systematic and scientific examination of visual materials that explores their communicative meaning, aesthetic qualities, and functional impact. As Susan Sontag noted, humans tend to linger in "mere images of the truth," making it crucial to develop a deeper understanding of visual interpretation. Study the PDF below (for academic use only) Introduction to Visual Analysis PDF The Nature of Seeing: The process of seeing is not as spontaneous or natural as commonly believed. According to John Berger, our way of seeing art has historically been influenced by privileged minorities to maintain social and economic dominance. Visual perception requires conscious effort and is heavily influenced by habits and conventions. The visual faculty consumes approximately two-third of a person’s used energy, highlighting its significance in human experience. The Framework of Visual Analysis: Visual analysis could be traced back to communication models, for example, Har...

Visual Analysis: SEMIOTICS

 Visual analysis is a systematic and scientific approach to examining visual materials that goes far beyond casual observation.  In our visually saturated world, images have become a inescapable universal language that shapes our perceptions, attitudes, and experiences. From the artworks adorning gallery walls to the advertisements lining city streets, visuals communicate narratives, evoke emotions, and reflect sociocultural ideologies. However, the process of seeing and interpreting visuals is not as spontaneous or natural as we often assume. As John Berger notably stated, "seeing is an active decision," suggesting that the process of interpreting visuals is neither spontaneous nor natural, but rather requires conscious effort and critical thinking. The way we perceive and interpret visual content is heavily influenced by habits, conventions, and our individual perspectives.  Serious visual analyses requires conscious effort and critical analysis to unravel the laye...

Visual Analysis: LANGUAGE, ELEMENTS, AND GRAMMAR

 Visual communication plays a powerful role in shaping our understanding of the world. Like written and spoken language, visuals employ a complex grammar and system of meaning. Study the PDF below (for academic use only) Visual language, elements, and grammar PDF At its core, visual grammar is comprised of fundamental elements like line, shape, colour, texture, space, and typography. These are the basic building blocks that visual creators assemble and organise using principles like emphasis, contrast, composition, size, proportion, balance, and lighting. Just as words are assembled following the syntactical rules of language, visuals are constructed by purposefully arranging and relating these elemental units. Lines, for instance, can convey a range of associations through their orientation and qualities. Horizontal lines suggest stability and calm, verticals impart a sense of strength and authority, while diagonals imbue dynamism and movement. The weight and curvature of lines fu...

Visual Analysis: WHAT ARE VISUALS?

  Visuals are images/collection of images that are  made to be  seen. There is a continuum of images in which people live; and visual is a paused/frozen moment from them. Study the PDF below (for academic use only) What Are Visuals? PDF People/artists/designers capture/construct/make images/visuals for others to see. Therefore we only see the image/visual/frame that is given to us to see. For John Berger, a visual is a sight which has been recreated or reproduced ... which has been detached from the place and time in which it first made its appearance. Art: Traditional art, the oldest form of visual expression, represents humanity's first attempts to interpret and document the world. From prehistoric cave paintings to Renaissance masterpieces and contemporary installations, art has evolved beyond mere representation to become a vehicle for emotional, philosophical, and social commentary. Artists manipulate colour, form, texture, and space to create works that challen...

The Brown Sisters: A Four-Decade Portrait of Time and Sisterhood

 Nicholas Nixon's "The Brown Sisters" stands as one of photography's most compelling longitudinal portrait studies, documenting four decades of sisterhood through annual black-and-white photographs taken from 1975 to 2014. Using an 8×10 inch view camera, Nixon captured his wife Bebe and her three sisters—Heather, Mimi, and Laurie Brown—in the same order each year, creating a remarkable visual meditation on time, aging, and familial bonds. For the full set of images see the PDF below (for academic use only) Forty Portraits in Forty Years PDF What began as a spontaneous family photograph in 1975 evolved into a profound artistic documentation of human transformation. The project's strength lies in its methodological consistency: the sisters maintain their positions, with the sequence remaining unchanged throughout the series. This rigid framework paradoxically highlights the subtle changes that occur year by year, creating a powerful commentary on the passage of time...

A Critical Visual Analysis of Jan Banning's ‘Bureaucratics’

 Jan Banning's photographic series Bureaucratics offers a remarkable anthropological study of civil servants across eight countries, revealing how power, hierarchy, and cultural identity manifest in governmental spaces. Through meticulously composed photographs taken from a citizen's perspective, Banning unveils the theatre of bureaucracy the most immediate visual impact comes from Banning's consistent methodology: each photograph is taken from the same height and distance, positioning the viewer in the role of a citizen approaching the bureaucrat's desk. The bureaucrats are photographed in their natural habitat – their offices – which become stages where power dynamics and cultural values are performed daily. Make visual analysis of  Bureaucratics  by Jan Banning given below. Bureaucratics by Jan Banning PDF  (for academic use only) In examining the spatial arrangements, a clear pattern emerges: the desk serves as both barrier and symbol of authority. In many image...

2025 Must Create Its Own Art

 Tonight’s art becomes inadequate
and useless when the sun rises in
the morning. The mistake lies not in creating art for tonight, but in assuming tonight’s answers will serve tomorrow’s questions. Louise Bourgeois, a French American artist, reflected, “art is a guaranty of sanity;” but that guarantee must be renewed with each dawn, each cultural shift, and
each evolution of human consciousness. If some art endures through generations, it
is only because of its capacity to speak, its ability to demand fresh interpretations that test and challenge the new. To guarantee sanity in the coming year, 2025 must create
its own art. Why create art? Why watch art? Why read literature? True art, in the words of Sunil P Ilayidam, shakes that which is rigid and unchangeable. Art serves as humanity’s persistent earthquake, destabilising comfortable certainties and creating space
for new ways of seeing, thinking, and being
in the world. An artist’s duty is to reflect the times, and we see this in...